Mohammad Atrianfar ranked first in last night’s debate with Pourmohammadi.
Political analyst Mohammad Atrianfar told Entekhab about the first debate of the presidential candidates that this series of debates was held with more informational capabilities and showed that the relevant advisors transferred information to the candidates more systematically. The state broadcaster and the respectful host had more time management and did not play any role in interfering with the order of the session, nor did they react to candidates deviating from the line of questions, whereas they should have reacted to candidates straying from the content of the questions.
He added that 4 out of these 6 people, excluding Mr. Pourmohammadi and Pezeshkian, collaborated with this government. They should be accountable for their criticisms of their own current situation, yet they overlooked the current state, and Mr. Pourmohammadi and Pezeshkian also did not object and overlooked it.
He continued regarding Pezeshkian’s performance, saying that one should watch all five debates, and one cannot make a correct judgment based on a single debate. In tonight’s debate, the first rank belonged to Mr. Pourmohammadi, who spoke more comprehensively than the other candidates. After Mr. Pourmohammadi, we can place Mr. Pezeshkian and Qalibaf’s conversations side by side and give them an equivalent score. The other individuals did not score well, and Mr. Zakani was aggressive and insulting and praised himself. Of course, Mr. Qalibaf also boasted about his past.
