The reaction of Ham Mihan newspaper to the interview with the father of Ajamian reveals an attempt to tarnish the independence of the judiciary.
Ham Mihan wrote that the incident that occurred during a television interview with the father of Rohollah Ajamian is unprecedented in the 45-year history of the revolution, and what is even more strange is that it seems no action will be taken in this regard, which is a dangerous factor in the situation.
The first point is that the producers and presenters of such programs have a thorough understanding of their guests in advance and have clear expectations of what they will say, and it is even possible that there have been prior arrangements before the program.
The second point is the conditions under which such discussions are raised, which is important.
The third point is the claims made by Ajamian’s father and the behavior of the presenter, which, if unable to prove, is a crime.
The fourth point is that it seems that the principles of justice, which are well-known in the speeches and behavior of the imams and available sources, should be given attention.
The last point is clear that a radical movement seeks to tarnish the independence of the judiciary by exerting pressure on this institution.
Persian
مشاهده این مقاله به زبان فارسی