End of the era of superstition master
Beginning of the downfall
At the end of the era of superstition master Raefipour during the parliamentary elections, he played a role in the emergence of a new political leader and movement called the Morning Front of Iran. He did not declare the sword against Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf from the Judiciary, whether this indictment was due to Raefipour and his team’s disclosures against Ghalibaf or not. However, the opinions of well-known users under Mehdi Kashtdar’s tweet, the CEO of Mizan News Agency, indicate that at least the supporters of this controversial speaker believe that the mentioned case is due to those issues and disclosures.
The issue of Masaf Institute, which is currently under judicial investigation, is related to financial matters and money laundering allegations. Of course, Masaf’s financial issues were also raised during these internal conflicts among the conservatives.
Documents related to suspicious transfers from Masaf Institute’s accounts to the Rafipour family’s accounts were published by Jalil Mahboubi, an employee of the Parliament’s Research Center and close to Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf.
Mahboubi played an important role in defending the Speaker of the Parliament and responding to the allegations against Masaf team during the conflicts between Rafipour and Ghalibaf supporters.
All these pressures and psychological warfare did not work, and Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf became the Speaker of the Twelfth Parliament.
It was heard from the very beginning that the downfall of Azad University professor had begun.
Rezaeepoor’s role in the presidential elections, his support for Jalili, and diverting the confrontation capacity behind the scenes of the hardliners’ candidate put him more under the scrutiny of Ghalibaf’s supporters. On the other hand, Ghalibaf’s supporters believe that Rezaeeepoor’s sabotage and his team’s confrontation against Ghalibaf during the parliamentary elections was one of the reasons for his decline in the presidential elections.
Now the presidential elections have also ended, and although not officially announced, Rezaeeepoor will likely have to answer for his disclosures and statements.
The wave of dissolution.
The presidential elections in the conservative camp have not yet ended. They are still looking for the culprit of their defeat, and the results of both election rounds have scrambled all their analyses.
The most pessimistic election analyses indicated that if the participation is 40% or less, Jalili will win. If it goes above 50%, Ghalibaf has a better chance, and if it reaches 60% or higher, it will send the doctors to Pasteur. However, with a 40% participation rate in the first round, the doctors and Jalili were sent to the second round, and with a 50% participation rate, the doctors won.
But with a 40% participation rate in the first round, the doctors and Jalili were sent to the second round, and with a 50% participation rate, the doctors won.
The spectrum blames Rafighpoor for this defeat for various reasons.
First, because his name is known as one of the pillars of Jalili’s non-withdrawal.
Secondly, his cyber team once again attacked Qalibaf during the presidential election, with all the qualities of Qalibaf, who had previously been the speaker of the parliament, remaining in his position and Saeed Jalili not becoming the president.
Shortly after the announcement of the election results, a wave of dissolution of the confrontation was launched on social networks.
Once again, the issue of Rafighpoor’s financial documents, his records, and expenses became hot topics on social media.
The entry of the Mashregh website, affiliated with a specific institution, into this political dispute was also interpreted as at least part of the power structure having an angle with these actions of the mentioned organizations.
The formalization of the legal case of Ali Akbar Rafighpoor and the continuation of investigations into possible violations of the institution have entered a new phase of confrontation with these organizations.
Financial issues of the confrontation.
Rafighpoor started his activities in the field of messianism, fighting against false mysticisms of Freemasonry and Zionism, but eventually turned to politics.
The name of the confrontation institution is actually an abbreviation for the struggle against Zionism, humanism, and Freemasonry.
Establishing a school by Masaf, the invention of weapons, ventilator equipment, medical equipment, and the existence of various units such as architectural and urban economic planning, sugar and honey unit, children’s candy unit, family unit, food security, always raised the question of where the cost of these organizations would be provided from.
Cyber costs and its components have also been separately questioned.
This institution claims that its costs are covered by public donations and offerings.
According to documents published by the team of Ghalibaf, accusations of money laundering are currently being raised in public opinion, not in judicial courts, to which Raeisi responded by releasing a video.
Soleimimine’s criticisms.
Different factions of the conservative spectrum have different ideological views on the Masaf movement and Raeisi, openly criticizing him.
Yesterday, after the issuance of an arrest warrant for Raeisi, a video of Abbas Soleimimine, a conservative political activist and a traditional supporter of Ghalibaf, was released on social media.
In this interview, Soleimimine, regarding the defeat of the conservatives in the elections, said that some untrustworthy individuals were turned into authorities, and those same individuals who were anti-List came and provided a list and acted worse.
In the party rule, we must adhere to the party’s manifesto. Sitting four elders against a young man whom we have no idea about his past and present, swearing in the party system does not exist.
In the previous parliamentary elections, we suffered a serious blow, and this blow was fully demonstrated in the current presidential elections.
Previously, Saliminemin defended him during the parliamentary elections when the issue of Qalibaf’s children’s trips abroad and other controversies against the Speaker of the Parliament was raised and faced harsh attacks and confrontations.
Before the helicopter crash carrying the president and the early announcement of the elections, Saliminemin had said that regarding the impact of the destruction against Qalibaf and his removal from the presidency of the parliament, attention should be paid to the fact that a person who resorts to destruction knows that he cannot hold the position of the parliament speaker. On the other hand, such a person has no reputation and will not be accepted even by those who accompanied him in the destructions. He will not be accepted as the Speaker of the Parliament.
Because these individuals also want to have a reputation, and at the same time, one of the factors that increases the reputation of the parliament is the speakership.
Ethnography and reactions
Mentions of posts by Mehdi Keshtdar on the X Twitter network clearly showed the intellectual separation of Twitter users and their relationship with the Raefipour trend.
Reactions can be divided into three categories.
The first group were supporters of Raefipour, who sarcastically referenced the statements made by Azhaei about not tarnishing the reputation of the accused CEO of the Judiciary News Agency.
Another part of this group were fans who dealt with the issue humorously and lightheartedly.
Another part of the supporters were those who compared the quick handling of Raefipour by the Judiciary with the prolonged handling of other cases.
The second group were supporters of Ghalibaf, who thanked the Judiciary and announced that they would wait for the outcome of the judicial review.
The third group were the indifferent and unbelievers who believed that nothing would happen given the connection of this issue with the accusations made by this trend and its manager against Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf. We tried to contact the close associates and advisors of the Speaker of the Parliament, but they either did not answer the phone or did not respond to the questions after being informed of the subject.
The source of the money should be identified.
Former parliament representative Mansour Haqiqatpour commented on this issue, saying, ‘I am not aware of the matter related to spreading lies, so I do not express any opinion on it. The judiciary system in the Islamic Republic of Iran exists and deals with these accusations and issues.’
However, the financial resources of this institution must be clarified. Where do their financial resources come from and how can they afford these expenses? We have a Hussainiya, but we cannot cover the costs of a 3 to 4 million salary for a prayer leader.
The financial resource providers definitely have interests.
For this reason, the source of the money must be identified, just as the source of the funds spent by the Stability Front and Mr. Jalili during the presidential elections and the bus expenses for people’s transportation must be clarified.
Persian
مشاهده این مقاله به زبان فارسی
