Untimely conversation between doctors and Maduro
The conversation between the President of Iran and the defeated President of Venezuela, Maduro, in the elections of that country, was of great importance, but its risky nature was not highlighted in the midst of other news. The fraud and the overturning of the results of the presidential elections in Venezuela were so blatant that important South American countries like Brazil and Chile stood against it from the very first day. In fact, Biden’s foreign policy team took a stance on these elections after much deliberation and later than some other countries, recognizing the opposition candidate as the election winner.
The Iranian regime is risking its stance on the results of the US elections and has not severed inappropriate ties with the Maduro government, which has not secured national interests and has been supporting specific business groups in Iran and providing financial and diplomatic support to Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Interestingly, in his recent conversation, Trump practically praised Maduro, calling him a dictator. Trump’s camaraderie with dictators has a special meaning, and this reflects the nature of Iran’s risk on the outcome of the November US elections. What needs attention is the full activation of the national security advisor, Harris.
Phil Gordon, who has entered this field and is pursuing programs to counter Maduro and support the opposition in Venezuela, has met with American ambassadors in his country, indicating the seriousness of his presence in American politics. Gordon is an experienced diplomat and a key figure in the negotiations of the JCPOA during the Obama era. It is natural that he and his colleagues will monitor the behavior of the medical government.
Perhaps Javad Zarif should reconsider the policies of the medical government and strive a bit for the independence of the government from the system’s policies and the revival of the democratic nature and elected nature of the executive branch.
Persian
مشاهده این مقاله به زبان فارسی
