The hardliners are lying in wait.
It is necessary to remind the honorable representative of Tehran and the philosophy lecturer at Ayatollah Misbah Yazdi Institute of a few points.
The reference to the Nabovian is probably related to the appointment of the government’s spokesperson, which has been under attack by well-known users of the virtual space, Kayhan newspaper, and some political hardline figures since the news of entrusting this responsibility to him was published.
The excuse for the attack is that Fatemeh Mahajerani said in a speech during the election that as a mother, we will not allow another Mehshad to fall on the ground, we will not allow a little integrity-seeking to fill our alleys with the blood of young people.
The representative from Tehran should clarify what is wrong with this statement and similar expressions of opinion.
Who wants another Mehshad to fall on the ground? Who wants blood to be shed on the ground in protest? This kind of opinion has its roots in a mindset that prefers to erase the essence of the problem and only be approved by politicians, analysts, journalists, and society.
Earlier, the discussion of the executive deputy of physicians had also arisen regarding why he had talked about the evacuation of protesters’ eyes in 1401.
The issuance of a general turmoil or sedition decree for a series of events like what happened in Iran in 1401 closes the door to proper analysis.
By issuing these decrees, there is neither a ground for accumulated dissatisfaction nor a mistake has occurred.
From A to Z, what happens is a scenario.
While an internal wave of protest is created in the country, sometimes with a wrong law, with a long-lasting life, the protests of 1401 following Mahsa, with protests against a critical situation, the Ahvaz water protests of 1400, the sudden implementation of a fate-making decision, the gasoline price hike of 1398, or numerous unanswered questions and ambiguities of the events of 1388, is every protest that occurs in our country a foreign scenario? If so, then we should recite the opening chapter of the country because the enemy, although successful once every few years, manages to destroy this country.
In this way of thinking, when an analysis is to be made, like what we read these days in Kayhan and its satellites or well-known users on Twitter start the wave about Arman Aliourdi and Rouhollah Azamian, but remain silent about the shooting in Zahedan, and the Kayhan writer allows himself to conceal eye injuries.
When they want to mention Mahsa Amini’s name or analyze issues, they use words that hide a kind of nervousness within themselves.
The thinking that Mr. Nabavian presents does not believe that there are roots of objection in Iran. In order to make himself comfortable and eliminate the problem, he issues a general order to end the disturbance and takes this order as a benchmark to measure how much others comply with his criteria.
Another aspect of Mr. Seyed Mahmoud Nabavian’s remarks is the same warnings that were raised after the results of the fourteenth elections. It seems that the medical community intends to compensate for some past wrong actions, such as purging professors and students, under the guise of national unity strategy.
It is still unclear whether he has made any agreements to solve the hijab issue and address the police crackdowns in the government. The issue of tension-inducing foreign policy is also raised.
Each of these cases is enough for Mr. Nabavian’s intellectual movement to feel that the revolution has deviated from its path and something needs to be done.
The honeymoon period of the new government will soon end, and according to past trends, it is expected that the broad and influential organization of IRIB, several news agencies, and at least two newspapers, especially the Friday prayer tribunes across the country, particularly in Mashhad, will return to the pre-1400 settings unless the realignment has truly changed. In that case, the return to the previous settings is not certain; rather, its intensity may decrease. In any case, individuals like the Friday prayer leader of Mashhad have a lot of independence for themselves.
We must see where the first point of conflict between hardliners and the fourteenth government will be. Remember December 2017.
