The Resalat Newspaper states that announcing figures and individuals in the Mobarakeh Steel case is playing with people’s minds.
In its editorial, Resalat Newspaper wrote about the parliamentary investigation report on Mobarakeh Steel, stating that questions, doubts, and even the parliamentary investigation report should not be presented as the final verdict. Only when the final appeal stage for the accused has been completed can individuals be considered guilty and corruption figures be announced. Before that, mentioning names and even stating figures is merely playing with the minds of the accused and, of course, the public.
Record this writing and the figures mentioned in the investigation report somewhere and compare them with the final court verdict that will be issued. You will see that much of what has been labeled as favoritism or misconduct in this case does not hold true.
Fundamentally, the philosophy and purpose of investigations are not to function like a court. However, perhaps the public does not distinguish between an investigation report and a court’s final verdict, and what gets sacrificed in between is the public’s trust.