Mohammad Atarayanfar ranked first in last night’s debate against Pourmohammadi.
Mohammad Atarayanfar, a political analyst, commented on the first debate of presidential candidates selection, saying that this debate was held with more informational resources and showed that the relevant advisors had conveyed information to the candidates with more order. The TV and the respectful host had more time management. They had no role in interfering with the order of the session and did not react to people deviating from the question line, while they should have reacted to people deviating from the content of the questions.
He added that 4 out of these 6 people, excluding Mr. Pourmohammadi and the doctors, were collaborating with this government. They should be accountable for their shortcomings in the current situation. However, they were overlooking the current situation, and Mr. Pourmohammadi and the doctors were also not objecting and were passing by it.
He continued to talk about the performance of the doctors, saying that you need to watch 5 debates and you can’t judge accurately based on just one debate. In tonight’s debate, Mr. Poormohammadi ranked first, and Kallantar talked about the other candidates. After Mr. Poormohammadi, we can consider the discussion between Mr. Pezeshkian and Ghalibaf side by side and give them an equal score. Other individuals did not receive appropriate scores. Mr. Zakani was also harsh and insulting, praising himself. Of course, Mr. Ghalibaf was also boasting about his past.
