Resalat Newspaper Declares That Announcing Figures and Individuals in the Mobarakeh Steel Case is Playing with People’s Minds
In its editorial, Resalat Newspaper wrote about the parliamentary investigation report on Mobarakeh Steel, stating that questions, doubts, and even the parliamentary investigation report should not be presented as the final statement. Only when the final stage of appeal for the accused has been completed can individuals be considered guilty and figures of corruption be announced. Before that, mentioning names and even figures is merely playing with the minds of the accused and, of course, the public.
Record these writings and the figures mentioned in the investigation report in a corner and compare them with the final court ruling that will be issued. You will see that much of what has been introduced as favoritism or misconduct in this case does not have a valid basis.
Fundamentally, the philosophy and purpose of investigation and inquiry are not to function like a court. However, the public may not differentiate between an investigation report and a final court ruling, and what is sacrificed in the process is the public’s trust.